Post-election rally in stocks stalls as S&P 500 falls 1%
- 2016-12-05
- By William Lynch
- Posted in Economy, Federal Reserve, Fixed Income, Interest Rates, Municipal Bonds, Oil Prices, The Market
You don’t need to be an expert in order to achieve satisfactory investment returns. But if you aren’t, you must recognize your limitations and follow a course certain to work reasonably well. Keep things simple and don’t swing for the fences. When promised quick profits, respond with a quick ‘no’. – Warren Buffett
Both the S&P 500 Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index fell last week, snapping their three-week winning streak, as investors took profits after the strong post-election rally in stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, however, managed to eke out a slight gain to keep its streak intact at four weeks. Most investment strategists were in agreement that the stock market had come too far, too fast and was due for a down week as stocks were overbought. Beneath the market’s surface, investors were rotating from one sector to another in an attempt to profit from the next winners. The Nasdaq, which primarily consists of technology stocks, tumbled 2.7% last week as financials, energy, materials and industrials continued to outperform. Consumer stables and utilities have also been weak recently. The market’s action, though, was not reflective of the economic data last week, which was mostly positive. The second gross domestic product (GDP) reading for the third quarter showed the economy expanded at a better-than-expected 3.2% annual pace. Consumer spending in the quarter grew at the fastest pace since 2002 and business investment was strong, growing at a 10% clip. The November employment report was also better than anticipated as 178,000 jobs were created and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.6%, a nine-year low. While this decline appears favorable at first glance, much of it was due to a jump in discouraged workers as 95 million people are currently not counted as part of the labor force. Another troubling sign in the employment report was a decline in wages, although a separate report on personal income registered its best reading since April. Consumers were also in a joyous mood as the U.S. consumer confidence index rose to 107 in November from 101 in October, a hopeful sign as the holiday shopping season gets into full swing.
Last Week
In other economic data last week, the Case-Shiller Index showed that U.S. home prices rose 5.5% in September and pending home sales edged slightly higher. Manufacturing data was also strong as the ISM manufacturing index and the Chicago purchasing managers index (PMI) were both comfortably in expansion territory in November. Construction spending rebounded strongly in October after a weak September.
OPEC agreed to reduce oil production by over a million barrels a day and, as a result, oil prices increased 9% and oil ended the week at over $51 a barrel. The Federal Reserve Beige Book showed that there is modest to moderate economic growth in most regions of the country. It noted that employment “continued to expand”, wage growth was “modest” and a strong dollar was a “headwind”.
For the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged up 0.1% to close at 19,170 while the S&P 500 Index lost 1% to close at 2,191. The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 2.7% to close at 5,255.
This Week
In a continuation of the strong manufacturing data reported last week, factory orders for October should be much higher than in September. Also on the calendar this week will be the ISM non-manufacturing or services sector index and the December Michigan Sentiment Index, which is expected to show that consumers remain confident about the economy and its prospects.
In overseas news, after voting on a referendum in Italy over the weekend that may determine whether or not Prime Minister Matteo Renzi remains in power, markets and particularly bank stocks could be volatile in the week ahead.
In another relatively slow week for quarterly earnings reports this week, the most familiar companies scheduled to report include AutoZone, Toll Brothers, H&R Block, Costco Wholesale, Broadcom and Bob Evans Farms.
Portfolio Strategy
For investors in municipal bonds and bond funds, the rise in interest rates since the election has resulted in falling municipal bond prices. While most municipal bond funds had been up about 2% through the end of October, those returns have evaporated and intermediate-term tax-exempt bond funds now show year-to-date losses of about 1%. Short-term municipal bond funds are also down about one half of a percent. The increase in rates has made high quality, 10-year municipal bonds very attractive with yields that approximate 3% in some cases. These yields are currently higher than yields on comparable Treasuries and high-quality corporate bonds with similar maturities even before taking into account the tax benefit. The reason for the weakness in municipal bond prices has been the anticipated pro-growth stimulus plans of president-elect Donald Trump, including higher spending and lower tax rates. Higher proposed infrastructure spending increases the supply of municipal bonds and lower tax rates reduce demand for these bonds. Both policies effectively result in lower prices for municipal bonds. Much of the sell-off in municipals, however, has been overdone as Trump has not even taken office yet and there is no guarantee that his policies will even be passed. Even if the policies are approved, they will take time to implement. Investors would be wise to stand pat and remember that the fixed income portion of their portfolio is designed to provide income and reduce the overall risk and volatility of the portfolio. Over time, rising interest rates can actually have a positive effect on returns as the yield of the portfolio rises and the investor receives more income.
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- Commodities
- Corporate Earnings
- Covid-19
- Dow Jones Industrial Average
- Economy
- Elections
- Emerging Markets
- European Central Bank
- Federal Reserve
- Fixed Income
- Geopolitical Risks
- Global Central Banks
- Interest Rates
- Municipal Bonds
- Oil Prices
- REITs
- The Fed
- The Market
- Trade War
- Uncategorized