Nasdaq falls 2.6% as investors take profits in technology stocks
- 2018-09-10
- By William Lynch
- Posted in Corporate Earnings, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Economy, Emerging Markets, Federal Reserve, Interest Rates
The key to investing is not assessing how much an industry is going to affect society, or how much it will grow, but rather determining the competitive advantage of any given company and, above all, the durability of that advantage. – Warren Buffett
The recent strong momentum in technology stocks came to an abrupt halt last week as the Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 2.6%, making it the worst performing major stock average. By almost any measure, valuations of technology stocks have become stretched and investors decided to take profits in what has been the best performing sector of the market this year. The most crowded trade has been in the so-called FANG stocks that include Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google (Alphabet) as these stocks have been popular holdings of fund managers. What may have sparked the selling were executives from social media giants Facebook and Twitter providing testimony before Congress. Concerns have increased recently that technology companies may be hurting competition and inhibiting a free exchange of ideas on their platforms, which could result in government regulation. Such talk provided investors with a convenient excuse to sell their winners and redeploy the proceeds in other sectors of the market that have underperformed. Trade tensions also continued to hang over the market as no agreement was reached between the U.S. and Canada and President Trump threatened China with a new round of tariffs on $267,000 billion of Chinese goods. While many of Trump’s economic policies are benefiting the U.S., they are doing so at the expense of overseas economies. As the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy and the value of the dollar rises, emerging markets have been under pressure and their stocks have been weak. It may take longer for emerging markets to bounce back, but technology stocks could reemerge as the best performing sector into year-end. Nevertheless, it is prudent to reduce exposure to riskier areas of the market in favor of a more defensive approach that emphasizes stocks with lower volatility.
Last Week
The employment report for August showed that 210,000 new jobs were created compared to an estimate of about 190,000 and the unemployment rate remained at 3.9%. Average hourly earnings were higher than expected and posted the highest wage growth since April 2009. The increase probably solidifies two additional interest rate hikes this year (September and December). The ISM manufacturing index in August was better than expected and at the highest level since May 2004 while the ISM non-manufacturing or services sector index was also strong and better than expected.
For the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.2% to close at 25,916 and the S&P 500 Index fell 1.0% to close at 2,871. The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 2.6% to close at 7,902.
This Week
Both the core producer price index (PPI) and consumer price index (CPI) for August are expected to increase modestly and match the year over year increase recorded in July. Import prices in August are expected to edge only slightly higher. August retail sales are forecast to post a healthy increase as consumer spending remains strong. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for September should remain at the same high level that it was in August.
Only a handful of companies report quarterly earnings this week and the most notable among them are Wageworks, Kroger, Oracle and Adobe Systems.
Portfolio Strategy
Being underweight technology stocks this year has hurt the performance of many value-oriented funds, including the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Companies within this index have consistently increased their dividends for at least 20 consecutive years. The reason why dividend growth stocks in this index have underperformed the S&P 500 Index this year is the lack of technology exposure. Until recently, most technology companies haven’t paid a dividend let alone raised their dividend for 20 consecutive years. Instead, these companies reinvested profits that would otherwise be paid in dividends to shareholders back in their businesses to fund future growth. Two funds that invest in dividend growth companies using the Dividend Aristocrats Index are the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Both of these exchange traded funds have the same investment objective of capital growth and dividend income and both ETFs have a current yield of 2.6%, compared to a yield of only 1.7% for the S&P 500 Index. The majority of stocks in the fund are large cap and they tend to be a mix of both value and growth stocks. Average sales and earnings growth of companies in the Aristocrats Index have also been on a par with those in the S&P 500 Index. While both NOBL and SDY have underperformed the S&P 500 this year, NOBL has outperformed this benchmark since its inception back in 2005. Both funds tend to be more defensive and less volatile than the S&P 500 and should provide investors with a smoother ride over the long term.
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- Commodities
- Corporate Earnings
- Covid-19
- Dow Jones Industrial Average
- Economy
- Elections
- Emerging Markets
- European Central Bank
- Federal Reserve
- Fixed Income
- Geopolitical Risks
- Global Central Banks
- Interest Rates
- Municipal Bonds
- Oil Prices
- REITs
- The Fed
- The Market
- Trade War
- Uncategorized