S&P 500 closes modestly higher on partial U.S.-China trade deal
- 2019-10-15
- By William Lynch
- Posted in Corporate Earnings, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Economy, Federal Reserve, Fixed Income, Interest Rates, Municipal Bonds, Trade War
Most of the time common stocks are subject to irrational and excessive price fluctuations in both directions as the consequence of the ingrained tendency of most people to speculate or gamble…to give way to hope, fear and greed. – Benjamin Graham
Trade negotiations between the U.S. and China resumed last week and when the talks ended on Friday, investors were finally rewarded with some good news, although it was not the broad deal they had been hoping for. After plunging early in the week on fading optimism that a deal would be reached, the major stock averages rallied to close modestly higher by Friday’s close. Nothing else seemed to matter last week as the focus was squarely on trade. Investors had lowered their expectations when Chinese trade officials said they were not in favor of a broad trade deal. The U.S. countered by saying it would be open to a short-term deal with a plan to address structural issues at a later date. Prior to the actual negotiations, the U.S. also added some of China’s top artificial intelligence firms to its blacklist in retaliation for China’s treatment of Muslim ethnic minorities. While this move was not directly trade-related, it did add to the skepticism that any trade agreement would be reached. When China commented that it would be open to a partial trade deal as long as no additional new tariffs were imposed, sentiment among investors became more positive. After meeting with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He on Friday, President Trump declared that the two sides had reached an agreement on “phase one” of a deal. China agreed to purchase between $40 and $50 billion in U.S. agricultural products and, in return, the U.S. agreed to postpone increasing tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports set to take effect on October 15th. Both sides also agreed to begin “phase two” talks immediately, but there was no clarity as to what these talks would involve. While this was certainly not the comprehensive trade agreement that many had hoped for, it was better than nothing and left investors satisfied that some progress had been made and optimistic that further talks would produce more positive results. Time will tell whether or not the markets are as sanguine.
Last Week
Both the producer price index (PPI) and the consumer price index (CPI) in September were weaker than expected as inflation remained benign. The PPI posted its largest decline since January and in the 12 months through September, it has increased only 1.4%. The CPI was unchanged, which was also its weakest reading since January, and has increased just 1.7% through September. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index was better than expected in October.
Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting in September showed that the trade war was the main concern for Fed officials. They also were concerned that markets were expecting more interest rate cuts than the central bank was willing to deliver. The markets are betting on another rate cut in October because of slowing global growth, the negative effects of the trade war and inflation hovering below 2%.
For the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.9% to close at 26,816 and the S&P 500 Index added 0.6% to close at 2,970. The Nasdaq Composite Index gained 0.9% to close at 8,057.
This Week
Retail sales for September are expected to post a modest increase in line with the previous month while September industrial production is expected to fall slightly after a healthy increase in August.
Third quarter earnings season begins with a slew of profit reports, particularly from the financials. Among the most notable of these are Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, Blackrock, American Express, UnitedHealth, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, IBM, Honeywell and Union Pacific.
Portfolio Strategy
Although yields on bonds have declined sharply this year and have resulted in above-average total returns for fixed income investors (bond prices move inversely to yields), it’s a struggle for investors to find attractive yields in this low interest-rate environment. To make matters worse, there is a 75% chance that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates again when it meets later this month. The fact that there is over $15 trillion in negative-yielding debt throughout the world only adds to the problem and makes U.S. debt more attractive by comparison. Treasury yields with maturities of 10 years or less are below 2% while investment grade corporate bond yields are only in the 3% to 4% range depending on the credit quality of the issuer and the maturity structure. For those investors in a high tax bracket, high-grade municipal bonds only offer yields between 1% and 3%. Money market fund yields are also below 2% and are likely to fall even further if the Federal Reserve continues to reduce the federal funds rate. With inflation running below 2%, the real return on bonds and money market funds with these low yields is paltry. When federal and state taxes are taken into account, the returns shrink even more. For investors with a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, alternative investments and cash, bonds and money market funds provide a ballast in the event stocks sell off and provide negative returns. Because the yield curve is flat right now with little difference between short-term bond yields and longer-term bond yields, it makes sense for investors to stay relatively short since they are not properly compensated for the risk involved in extending maturities should interest rates suddenly move higher.
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- Commodities
- Corporate Earnings
- Covid-19
- Dow Jones Industrial Average
- Economy
- Elections
- Emerging Markets
- European Central Bank
- Federal Reserve
- Fixed Income
- Geopolitical Risks
- Global Central Banks
- Interest Rates
- Municipal Bonds
- Oil Prices
- REITs
- The Fed
- The Market
- Trade War
- Uncategorized